Compare the2026 Mazda CX-50VS 2026 Jeep Cherokee

The Mazda CX-50 has standard driver and front passenger side knee airbags mounted low on the dashboard. These airbags help prevent the driver and front passenger from sliding under their seatbelts or the main frontal airbags; this keeps them better positioned during a collision for maximum protection. Knee airbags also help keep the legs from striking the dashboard, preventing knee and leg injuries in the case of a serious frontal collision. The Cherokee doesn’t offer a front passenger side knee airbag.

In a Vehicle-to-Vehicle Frontal Crash Prevention 2.0 test conducted by the Insurance Institute for Highway Safety (IIHS), the Mazda CX-50 achieved a “Acceptable” rating - the second highest possible - for its performance in forward collision warning and automatic braking systems, demonstrating its excellent capabilities in preventing collisions. The Jeep Cherokee has not been tested.

The CX-50 has standard Secondary Collision Reduction System, which automatically apply the brakes in the event of a crash to help prevent secondary collisions and prevent further injuries. The Cherokee doesn’t offer a post collision braking system: in the event of a collision that triggers the airbags, more collisions are possible without the protection of airbags that may have already deployed.

Both the CX-50 and the Cherokee have standard driver and passenger frontal airbags, front side-impact airbags, driver knee airbags, side-impact head airbags, height adjustable front shoulder belts, four-wheel antilock brakes, all wheel drive, traction control, electronic stability systems to prevent skidding, crash mitigating brakes, daytime running lights, lane departure warning systems, blind spot warning systems, rearview cameras, rear cross-path warning, driver alert monitors and available around view monitors.

The Mazda CX-50 has achieved the Insurance Institute for Highway Safety’s (IIHS) highest rating of “Top Safety Pick Plus” for the 2025 model year. This distinction is based on its exceptional performance in IIHS’ rigorous battery of safety tests. Specifically, it earned a “Good” rating in the latest, more stringent moderate overlap front crash test, a “Good” result in the updated side impact test, and a “Good” score in the revised pedestrian crash prevention test. The Cherokee has not yet been evaluated by the IIHS for 2025.

J.D. Power and Associates’ 2025 survey of the owners of three-year-old vehicles provides the statistics that show that Mazda vehicles are more reliable than Jeep vehicles. J.D. Power ranks Mazda third in reliability, above the industry average. With 114 more problems per 100 vehicles, Jeep is ranked 33rd.

From surveys of all its subscribers, Consumer Reports’ March 2025 Auto Issue reports that Mazda vehicles are more reliable than Jeep vehicles. Consumer Reports ranks Mazda 13 places higher in reliability than Jeep.

The CX-50’s optional 2.5 DOHC 4-cylinder hybrid produces 9 more horsepower (219 vs. 210) than the Cherokee’s 1.6 turbo 4-cylinder hybrid. The CX-50’s optional 2.5 turbo 4-cylinder produces 46 more horsepower (256 vs. 210) and 90 lbs.-ft. more torque (320 vs. 230) than the Cherokee’s 1.6 turbo 4-cylinder hybrid.

On the EPA test cycle the CX-50 2.5 4-cylinder Hybrid CVT gets better fuel mileage than the Cherokee (39 city/37 hwy vs. 42 city/33 hwy).

An engine control system that can shut down some of the engine’s cylinders helps improve the CX-50 (except Turbo/Hybrid)’s fuel efficiency. The Cherokee doesn’t offer a system that can shut down part of the engine.

The CX-50’s standard fuel tank has 2.2 gallons more fuel capacity than the Cherokee (15.9 vs. 13.7 gallons).

For better traction, the CX-50 2.5 S Premium/2.5 Turbo/Turbo Premium Plus’ tires are larger than the largest tires available on the Cherokee (245/45R20 vs. 235/50R20).

The CX-50 2.5 S Premium/2.5 Turbo/Turbo Premium Plus’ tires provide better handling because they have a lower 45 series profile (height to width ratio) that provides a stiffer sidewall than the Cherokee Overland’s 50 series tires.

For better maneuverability, the CX-50 Hybrid’s turning circle is 4.9 feet tighter than the Cherokee’s (35.4 feet vs. 40.3 feet). The CX-50’s turning circle is 4.3 feet tighter than the Cherokee’s (36 feet vs. 40.3 feet).

For greater off-road capability the Meridian/Turbo Premium Plus has a greater minimum ground clearance than the Cherokee (8.6 vs. 8 inches), allowing the CX-50 to travel over rougher terrain without being stopped or damaged.

The Mazda CX-50 may be more efficient, handle and accelerate better because it weighs about 300 to 550 pounds less than the Jeep Cherokee.

A low lift-over cargo hatch design makes loading and unloading the CX-50 easier. The CX-50’s cargo hatch lift-over height is 28.4 inches, while the Cherokee’s liftover is 31.2 inches.

The CX-50 Premium Plus/Turbo Premium has a standard heads-up display that projects speed, warning and navigation instruction readouts in front of the driver’s line of sight, allowing drivers to view information without diverting their eyes from the road. The Cherokee doesn’t offer a heads-up display.

The CX-50’s front and rear power windows all open or close fully with one touch of the switches, making it more convenient at drive-up windows and toll booths, or when talking with someone outside the car. The Cherokee’s rear power window switches have to be held the entire time to open or close them fully.

To help drivers see further while navigating curves, the CX-50 Turbo/Hybrid Premium Plus has standard adaptive headlights to illuminate around corners automatically by reading vehicle speed and steering wheel angle. The Cherokee doesn’t offer cornering lights.

To quickly and conveniently keep personal devices charged without cables tangling and wearing out, the Mazda CX-50 has a standard wireless phone charging system (Qi) in the center console. Only the Cherokee Limited/Overland offers wireless charging.

Consumer Reports® recommends the Mazda CX-50, based on reliability, safety and performance.